(ORDER LIST: 530 U.S.)MONDAY, JUNE 26, 2000
CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
99-935 CHANDLER, MICHAEL, ETC. V. SIEGELMAN, GOV. OF AL ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Santa Fe
Independent School District v. Doe, 530 U.S. ___ (2000).99-1264
BROWN, JAMES H. V. O'DEA, WARDEN
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Terry Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. ___ (2000).
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
99M94 BYRD, HARLEY A. V. SALMON, STEVE
The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out-of-time is denied.108, ORIG. NEBRASKA V. WYOMING, ET AL. The motion of the Special Master for comnpensation and reimbursement of expenses is granted, and the Special Master is awarded a total of $90,755.32 for the period December 2, 1999 through June 5, 2000, to be paid as follows: 40% by Nebraska, 40% by Wyoming, 3% by Colorado, 12% by the United States, and 5% by Basin Electric Power Cooperative.99-1178 SOLID WASTE AGENCY, ETC. V. U.S. ARMY CORP. ENGINEERS The motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted.99-1257 BROWNER, EPA ADMINR. V. AM. TRUCKING ASSNS., ET AL.99-1426 AM. TRUCKING ASSNS., ET AL. V. BROWNER, EPA ADMINR. The motion of the Solicitor General to dispense with printing the joint appendices is granted.APPEALS -- JURISDICTION NOTED99-1864 ) HUNT, GOV. OF NC, ET AL. V. CROMARTIE, MARTIN, ET AL. )99-1865 ) SMALLWOOD, ALFRED, ET AL. V. CROMARTIE, MARTIN, ET AL. In these cases probable jurisdiction is noted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.CERTIORARI GRANTED99-1551 SEMTEK INTL. INC. V. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP.99-1571 TrafFIX DEVICES, INC. V. MARKETING DISPLAYS, INC. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.99-1408 ATWATER, GAIL, ET AL. V. LAGO VISTA, TX, ET AL. The motion of American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, Inc., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.99-1687 ) BARTNICKI, GLORIA, ET AL. V. VOPPER, FREDERICK W., ET AL. )99-1728 ) UNITED STATES V. VOPPER, FREDERICK W., ET AL. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.99-1702 TEXAS V. COBB, RAYMOND L. The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of National Association of Police Organizations, et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Texas District & County Attorneys Association, et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition.99-1792 DIR. OF REVENUE OF MO V. CoBANK ACB The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following question: "Does 12 U.S.C. Section 2134 authorize states to tax the income of the National Bank for Cooperatives, a federally chartered instrumentality of the United States?".99-8576 GLOVER, PAUL L. V. UNITED STATES The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.CERTIORARI DENIED99-905 ARMSTRONG SURGICAL CTR. V. ARMSTRONG CTY. MEM. HOSP.99-1349 HALE, MATTHEW F. V. ILLINOIS BAR, ET AL.99-1457 DITTMAN, ROY RICHARD V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.99-1490 ) SOUTH DAKOTA, ET AL. V. YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE, ET AL. )99-1683 ) YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE, ET AL. V. GAFFEY, MATT, ET AL.99-1504 NEDER, ELLIS E. V. UNITED STATES99-1556 ALCOA INC., ET AL. V. BONNEVILLE POWER ADMIN.99-1594 BUTTS, JAMES, ET AL. V. McNALLY, JAMES, ET AL.99-1623 WASHINGTON, BERNITA, ET AL. vs. CSC CREDIT SVCS., ET AL.99-1677 MYSTIC TRANSP., INC., ET AL. V. CARLTON, CHARLES99-1704 INTER-MODAL RAIL EMPLOY. V. BURLINGTON N., ET AL.99-1706 SULLIVAN, RICHARD V. RIVER VALLEY SCH. DIST.99-1708 HILLCREST DEV. V. RIVERSIDE, CA, ET AL.99-1710 UTAH V. CANNON, LINDA99-1711 CUCAMONGANS UNITED, ET AL. V. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ET AL.99-1715 SOPER, RENEE, ETC., ET AL. V. HOBEN, CHRISTINE, ET AL.99-1716 BIBBEE, JAMES R. V. SCOTT, WARDEN99-1742 BARRETT, JOHN, ET UX. vs. HARWOOD, MARY, ET AL.99-1743 BUCKLEY, PATRICK V. PORTAGE, MI, ET AL.99-1744 FLORIDA V. CONNER, DAVID R.99-1752 SPORTY'S FARM, L. L. C. vs. SPORTSMAN'S MARKET, INC.99-1753 SEWELL, DARYL K. V. MICHIGAN99-1754 KAHN, LEONARD R. V. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.99-1761 NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS V. PARNELL, ANGELA, ETC., ET AL99-1764 CERVONE, DAVID P. V. BORIS, CHARLES L.99-1767 CASKEY, MARVIN J. V. PENSION BENEFIT CORP.99-1771 KAHRE, ROBERT vs. U. S. FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO99-1773 MEYER, TANYA V. MEYER, RONALD ALLEN99-1779 WEE, JOHN C., ET UX. vs. ANDREWS, JOHN, ET AL.99-1781 PIETRANGELO, JAMES E. V. UNITED STATES SENATE99-1793 BOWEN, JULIE A., ET AL. vs. BD. OF PATENT APPEALS99-1803 McDUFFIE, ERNEST, ETC. V. UNITED STATES99-1810 MARTIN, MICHAEL R. V. UNITED STATES99-1830 MOBIL OIL CORP., ET AL. V. McMAHON FOUNDATION, ET AL.99-1837 ANDERSON, WILLIAM R., ET UX. vs. CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT COMM.99-1846 GOULD, THEODORE B. V. UNITED STATES99-1866 INFELISE, ROCCO E. V. UNITED STATES99-1868 FRIES, LEO vs. WI CT. OF APP., ET AL.99-1873 LODD ENTERPRISES, ET AL. V. COASTAL FORD, INC., ET AL.99-1885 STROGOV, EMILIA V. NEW YORK99-1888 INTL. CUSTOMS ASSOCS., ET AL V. FORD MOTOR CO., ET AL.99-1895 DeVEGTER, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES99-1905 EL-FADLY, ABD EL-HAMID A. vs. IRS99-6865 CAGLE, WILBURN G., ET AL. vs. HUTTO, T. D., ET AL.99-7367 VAZQUEZ, RANDOLPH C., ET AL. V. CARVER, TIMOTHY, ET AL.99-8312 TUCKER, ORVILLE V. UNITED STATES99-8585 COLLADO, JUAN V. UNITED STATES99-8837 SHEHEE, KEVIN L. V. LUTTRELL, MARK H., ET AL.99-8842 DELEVEAUX, JAMES V. vs. UNITED STATES99-9164 SMITH, RICHARD D. V. HARGETT, WARDEN99-9170 ORTIZ, ANDRES H. V. MOORE, SEC., FL DOC99-9171 SHEA, ROBERT V. vs. VERMONT99-9191 PORTER, PAUL V. POTOCKI, TERESA99-9195 LUKEN, RICHARD V. CALIFORNIA99-9198 OWENS, LAMONT E. V. DORMIRE, SUPT., JEFFERSON99-9199 TIMMONS, WILLIE J. V. KEMNA, MICHAEL, ET AL.99-9205 NASH, DAVID L. V. BATTLE, WARDEN, ET AL.99-9206 THOMPSON, MATTHEW V. OKLAHOMA99-9208 ODOM, CHRISTOPHER V. COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON99-9213 AGUIRRE, ARMANDO V. CLARKE, WARDEN, ET AL.99-9217 LITTERAL, JAMES C. V. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, ET AL.99-9221 KING, SHERRY T. V. BOYD, JAMES, ET AL.99-9223 MELONCON, PHILLIP C. V. GODINICH, JEROME99-9225 MARTIN, THOMAS A. V. EHRLICH, MARC S.99-9227 ODOM, CHRISTOPHER V. SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.99-9228 SPULKA, KENNETH V. WALKER, SUPT., AUBURN99-9231 BOITNOTT, JERALD W. V. CRIST, WARDEN99-9233 ATHERTON, PETER J. V. SNYDER, ARTHUR E., ET AL.99-9234 CUDNOHOSKY, BERNIE V. CIRCUIT COURT OF WI, ET AL.99-9235 ALDAZABAL, JOSE V. MORGAN, WARDEN99-9236 BAEZ, ROBERTO V. FOLES, CHIEF DEPUTY SHERIFF99-9251 HARRISON, WILLIE V. CAIN, WARDEN99-9252 DUBUC, BRIAN D. V. JOHNSON, SATAYABAMA, ET AL.99-9253 DANIEL, STEVEN E. V. PAPERBACK SWAP-N-SHOP99-9255 GIBSON, RUFUS V. NEW YORK CITY, ET AL.99-9259 SMITH, JAMES R. V. CALIFORNIA99-9263 CHEATHAM, CHARLES L. V. WARD, WARDEN99-9265 BURNETT, CARL V. GREEN, MELODY99-9273 THAMES, BRIAN F. V. WHITE, WARDEN, ET AL.99-9274 TAYLOR, THADDEUS V. CT BD. OF MEDIATION, ETC.99-9296 ROBERTS, GEORGE W. T. vs. MOORE, SEC., FL DOC99-9317 RICHARDSON-LONGMIRE, CHRIS V. KANSAS99-9321 MORGAN, WALTER D. V. NV BOARD OF PRISON COMMRS.99-9362 PROPER, JOEY S. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ99-9433 KHASHOGGI, SHAIKH SHI'TE T. vs. MOORE, SEC., FL DOC, ET AL.99-9487 ORYANG, BENJAMIN B. V. MITCHEM, WARDEN, ET AL.99-9488 REDMOND, RANDELL J. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ99-9489 RICHARDSON, WILLIAM L. V. WEST VIRGINIA99-9506 MATHIS, VERNON D. V. HENDERSON, POSTMASTER GEN.99-9565 JOHNSON, HAYES V. WISCONSIN99-9566 ) JACKSON, AUTUMN V. UNITED STATES )99-9693 ) MEDINA, JOSE V. UNITED STATES99-9568 LOWRY, VINCENT P. V. DEPT. OF DEFENSE99-9578 TORRECH-GONZALEZ, JOSE V. UNITED STATES99-9588 HERNANDEZ-GARCIA, GIOVANY V. UNITED STATES99-9594 ERVIN, TOMAS G. V. LUEBBERS, SUPT., POTOSI99-9606 UPSHER, ROBERT L. V. UNITED STATES ARMY99-9616 ) ROBINSON, JOHN V. UNITED STATES )99-9672 ) WARREN, JOHN W. V. UNITED STATES99-9620 KELLY, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES99-9640 YEPEZ, JOSE W. V. UNITED STATES99-9653 HOGAN, ERIC V. UNITED STATES99-9656 HILL, CHRISTOPHER B. V. UNITED STATES99-9658 ANIEKWU, ANTHONY C. V. UNITED STATES99-9660 DAVID, ANTHONY D. V. UNITED STATES99-9662 GUIMOND, DONALD E. V. UNITED STATES99-9663 HANKEY, LAVERN V. UNITED STATES99-9670 BELL, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES99-9671 PRINCE, WILLIAM L. V. UNITED STATES99-9673 ZAKARIA, HOSAM M. V. UNITED STATES99-9680 PEARSON, ERIC D. V. UNITED STATES99-9685 JARRELL, BOBBY V. UNITED STATES99-9689 ISAACS, RANDY G. V. UNITED STATES99-9691 LEDESMA, LUIS C. V. UNITED STATES99-9700 BROOKS, MARCUS A. V. UNITED STATES99-9704 LIPSCOMB, DENISHHA, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES99-9711 WINTERS, GERALD V. UNITED STATES99-9714 PEARSALL, ROBERT W. V. UNITED STATES99-9716 REYNOLDS, WELDON K. V. OHIO99-9725 PENA, DOMINGO, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES99-9727 SPADE, ROBERT W. V. OHIO99-9728 FRAY, DAWN A. V. UNITED STATES99-9733 HAZEL, BOBBY E. V. UNITED STATES99-9742 HINOJOSA, EVARISTO V. PURDY, WARDEN99-9744 HUNT, SIDNEY V. UNITED STATES99-9758 BIVINS, KAREN V. UNITED STATES99-9759 COLLINS, TORY V. UNITED STATES99-9764 ALALADE, OLUSOLA A. V. UNITED STATES The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.99-1667 ANDERSON, MADISON V. JOHNSON, MERLL, ET AL. The motion of respondents Wayne County Circuit Court, et al., for sanctions, including double costs and attorneys fees, is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.99-1733 SHOPPERS FOOD WAREHOUSE V. MORENO, ASUNCION The motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.HABEAS CORPUS DENIED99-9772 IN RE ROBERT DEEMER The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.PROHIBITION DENIED99-9563 IN RE DANIEL B. JEFFS The petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.REHEARING DENIED99-1453 U.S., EX REL. A-1 AMBULANCE V. MONTEREY COUNTY, CA, ET AL. The petition for rehearing is denied.ATTORNEY DISCIPLINED-2148 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM T. STONE William T. Stone, of Williamsburg, Virginia, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of March 27, 2000; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that William T. Stone is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2149 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEPHEN L. RASKIN Stephen L. Raskin, of South Miami, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of March 27, 2000; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Stephen L. Raskin is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2150 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF N. DAVID KORONES N. David Korones, of St. Petersburg, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of March 27, 2000; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that N. David Korones is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2152 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF TIMOTHY S. HALEY Timothy S. Haley, of Caldwell, New Jersey, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of March 27, 2000; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Timothy S. Haley is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2153 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM M. SCALF William M. Scalf, of Corbin, Kentucky, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 3, 2000; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that William M. Scalf is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2154 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES LLEWELLYN ADAMS James Llewellyn Adams, of Breckenridge, Colorado, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 3, 2000; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that James Llewellyn Adams is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2156 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EKITA LEVERETTE MITCHELL Ekita Leverette Mitchell, of Silver Spring, Maryland, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 3, 2000; and a rule having been issued requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Ekita Leverette Mitchell is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2159 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GEOFFREY SCOTT BLACK Geoffrey Scott Black, of Hampstead, Maryland, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 24, 2000; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Geoffrey Scott Black is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2165 IN THE MATTER OF DAVID FERRIS TAMER David Ferris Tamer, of Winston-Salem, North Carolina, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on May 22, 2000, is discharged.D-2166 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DANIEL G. CARROLL Daniel G. Carroll, of Chicago, Illinois, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2167 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHARLES H. JACOBS Charles H. Jacobs, of Dubuque, Iowa, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2168 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF TREVOR L. BROOKS Trevor L. Brooks, of New York, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2169 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS MICHAEL BOOKER Thomas Michael Booker, of Austin, Texas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2170 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RICHARD DENNIS ESPER Richard Dennis Esper, of El Paso, Texas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2171 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBET LEE BURNETT, JR. Robet Lee Burnett, Jr., of Beaumont, Texas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2172 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RONALD SILVER Ronald Silver, of Coral Gables, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2173 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GLENN MICHAEL ROCCA Glenn Michael Rocca, of Fort Lee, New Jersey, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2174 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH PAUL KIERPIEC Joseph Paul Kierpiec, of Detroit, Michigan, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2175 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARSHALL D. TANDY Marshall D. Tandy, of Tucson, Arizona, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2176 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HOWELL JACKSON GREGORY Howell Jackson Gregory, of Columbia, South Carolina, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
