|
|
|||||
|
Supreme Court Orders[Download PDF] (ORDER LIST: 533 U.S.) ORDERS IN PENDING CASES99-1786 GREAT-WEST LIFE INS., ET AL. V. KNUDSON, JANETTE, ET VIRThe motion of Maryland HMO Subrogation Plaintiffsfor leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted.The motion of the Solicitor General for leave toparticipate in oral argument as amicus curiae and fordivided argument is granted.00-795 ASHCROFT, ATTY. GEN., ET AL. V. FREE SPEECH COALITION 00-1293 ASHCROFT, ATTY. GEN. V. ACLU, ET AL. The motions of the Solicitor General to dispensewith printing the joint appendices are granted.01-286 TWEEDY, CRAIG V. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION (00A1141) The application for stay addressed to JusticeThomas and referred to the Court is denied. REHEARINGS DENIED00-1713 GONZALEZ, RAMON T. V. UNITED STATES00-5778 EVANS, MARLON D. V. GALAZA, WARDEN, ET AL. 00-8388 ) SCALES, ANDRE V. UNITED STATES 00-8597 ) VELEZ, DAVID V. UNITED STATES 00-9047 ALEXANDER, WILLIAM T. V. MOSLEY, WARDEN 00-9343 SINGLETON, DONNA R. V. DAHLBERG, ACTG. SEC. OF ARMY 00-9403 KIRTLEY, LORRAINE V. BAKER, GENNEY 00-9547 SCHEIB, CAROLE L. V. MELLON BANK, ET AL. 00-9631 WHITE, JAMES B. V. UTAH, ET AL. 00-9712 HENDERSON, RODNEY W. V. LOCKYER, ATT'Y GEN. OF CA 00-9956 CANDELARIO, JOSE M. V. UNITED STATES 00-10305 REEVES, JOHN H. vs. OH BUREAU OF EMPLOY. SERV. The petitions for rehearing are denied. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINED-2254 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHUCK R. STIDHAMChuck R. Stidham, of Cincinnati, Ohio, is suspendedfrom the practice of law in this Court and a rule willissue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to showcause why he should not be disbarred from the practiceof law in this Court.D-2255 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRANCIS BIRT EVANS, JR. Francis Birt Evans, Jr., of Canton, New York, issuspended from the practice of law in this Court and arule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiringhim to show cause why he should not be disbarred fromthe practice of law in this Court.D-2256 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID GRIFFITHS David Griffiths, of Bronx, New York, is suspendedfrom the practice of law in this Court and a rule willissue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to showcause why he should not be disbarred from the practiceof law in this Court. |
|||||