Supreme Court Orders

[Download PDF]

(ORDER LIST: 545 U.S.)

MONDAY, JUNE 13, 2005

CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509 (2004), and Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. ____ (2005).

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. ____ (2005).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. ____ (2005).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for furtherconsideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. ____ (2005).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. ____ (2005).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. ____ (2005).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. ____ (2005).

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. ____ (2005).

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

The application for a temporary restraining order addressed to Justice Breyer and referred to the Court is denied.

The motion of petitioner for leave to file a supplemental brief after argument is denied.

The motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted.

The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 5, 2005, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

CERTIORARI DENIED

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is denied.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is denied.

HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

MANDAMUS DENIED

The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.

REHEARINGS DENIED

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

RECESS ORDER

The Court will take a recess from Monday, June 13, 2005, until Monday, June 20, 2005.